Bharat Vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Bharat Vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Description

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section284,285&286 read with Sections395,396,460,302 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860Legality of Commission Evidence–Procedure–

Appointment of Local Commissioner–Accused had committed theft in the temple and murdered the chowkidar of the temple–The trial court convicted the accused based on evidence collected through a local commission–The ACJM, erroneously appointed a private individual as the Local Commissioner instead of a Magistrate–Appeal against Conviction–Held–That, where the essential prerequisites for issuing a commission are not complied with, the evidence so taken is inadmissible and cannot be used against the accused–A commission can only be issued to a CJM or a Metropolitan Magistrate, who must either execute it personally or appoint another Magistrate–Conviction and sentencing set aside–matter remanded for a fresh trial following due process of law. (Paras 15 & 16)

Published on
31 January 2025
Last Updated Date
09-05-2025
File Size
453.64 KB
File Type
application/pdf
Hits
100 Hits
You do not have permission to download this document
Please contact admin to get permission.
×