Gaurav Chaudhary & anr. Vs State of H.P. & anr.

Gaurav Chaudhary & anr. Vs State of H.P. & anr.

Description

(A)   Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section482 read with Sections498A,323,355,504,506 & 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860Quashing of FIR–Specific allegations–

In FIR, complainant has levelled general allegations, without specifying any date, time or year, when the allegations of threatening  to get marriage with her husband dissolved–Held–That, the allegations against the petitioners is totally vague and same does not fall within in the definition of ‘specific allegation’. (Para 21)

(B)   Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section482 read with Sections498A,323,355,504,506 & 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860Quashing of FIR against the family and close relatives Prima facie case is made or notAs per complainant, she has been tortured and being abused for bringing less dowryWhether allegations against the petitioners are prima facie sufficient to sustain the prosecutionGeneral and vague allegations without specific instances of criminal conduct do not justify prosecution of family membersCourts must be cautious and pragmatic in assessing allegations, particularly when family members reside separately or have rare contact with the complainant. 

(C)   Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section482 read with Sections498A,323,355,504,506 & 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860Inherent PowersConsiderationFrivolous or Vexatious proceedingsWhether facts to be considered when entire family members have been roped-in case on the general allegationsHeldThat, the Court owes a duty to look into many other attending circumstances emerging from the record of the case over and above the averments and, if need be, with due care and circumspection try to read in between the lines–Petition allowed. (Paras 16 and 17)

Published on
31 January 2025
Last Updated Date
09-05-2025
File Size
505.69 KB
File Type
application/pdf
Hits
21 Hits
You do not have permission to download this document
Please contact admin to get permission.
×